In this article author Liane Davey explains the idea that everyone’s network should provide both instrumental and psychological support, a framework derived from the concept of mentors and protégés. Davey illustrates her modern take on this traditional relationship by defining both types of support, differentiating the types of people in our modern networks who provide these supports, and outlining a means test for individuals to determine whether one’s network provides these supports.
In contrast to Cross & Thomas’ multipronged approach to evaluating one’s network Davey offers a simple yes/no approach for assessing one’s network to determine how effectively it is providing both instrumental and psychological supports. I see Davey’s approach as one I can implement regularly by asking myself her simple questions and use those reflections to make measurable pivots and choices in my networking. Both articles acknowledge that networks can become lopsided and counterproductive, and I see Davey’s approach as a method for checking in with myself. At present I am confident that I am lacking in psychological support based on Davey’s self-assessment. This is likely a side-effect of our global pandemic and new stay at home lifestyles. This balance may improve as workplaces return to their physical workspaces but gives me no reason to wait that long. Davey insists that coming up short in psychological support is not something to ignore. Her recommendation to meet someone for coffee or talk connect with people in my neighborhood may be outdated, but my ability to overcome challenge will help restore balance to my personal life and career.
LO4: Apply communication-centered scholarship to strengthen communication and effectiveness.
Comments